![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Replace the enemy's flags and standards with our own. Mix the captured chariots with our own, treat the captured soldiers well. This is called defeating the enemy and increasing our strength.
Let there be no mistake as to who is in control. After the conquest increase your own strength by drawing on their strength and talent. Begin building loyalty at once |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Replace the enemy's flags and standards with our own. Mix the captured chariots with our own, treat the captured soldiers well. This is called defeating the enemy and increasing our strength.
Use what you capture! Everything you can take from the enemy is a blow to his war effort and a boost to yours. Treat the captives well, in hopes of their defection, or tidbits of useful information in exchange for freedom. Everything you can take from the enemy and use against the enemy, do. It's much more resourceful than doing all the work yourself. Fight the enemy... with the enemy. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Replace the enemy's flags and standards with our own. Mix the captured chariots with our own, treat the captured soldiers well. This is called defeating the enemy and increasing our strength.
Kipling had a lot to say on this point. Replacing the flags and standards removes the enemy's identity, hierarchy, and communication. Its command and control. Captured chariots are chariots the enemy has to rebuild and that one's own people do not have to build and transport to the location of the army. Treating the captured soldiers well keeps the next wave of troops from girding their loins and fighting with desperate ferocity. One absolutely does not want the opposition eating up its food, burning its train, and distributing all the vodka. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
My take on this passage is the same as it seems to be for most others on this thread. Converting the enemy's resources to our own use, be it men or material, decreases the enemy's strength and simultaneously increases ours. This is more efficient than simply destroying the enemy.
You do this to material acquisitions by placing your symbol of ownership or control on them as you use them (so this no mistake among the enemy or your own as to whose it now is). By treating captured soldiers well you can convert them to your cause at best, or at the least, secure their neutrality if they opt not to fully support you. When you've removed them from combat by defeating them, then show leniency, any animosity that may have existed toward you will be diminished if not extinguished. Even if they won't outright help you they won't be given any more reason to harm you than they already had, especially if they remain under your power. Following this practice you might make new allies but you will avoid making new enemies. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did the practice of replacing flags begin around Sun Tzu's time? I always wondered where that started.
As far as treating captured enemy soldiers well, it seems this would be a good idea so as not to create more martyrs. I'm not sure I can see them just changing sides after capture, but it will at least create less new problems. But I think the real reason to do it is because it is The Way. Just like not killing children. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Appropriate! Appropriate! Appropriate!
Win over! Win over! Win over! Score a propaganda coup while you use the enemy's material resources against him and persuade his troops to come over to your side. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Do not distroy your enemy, use them to increase your advantages. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What is will of general is the main concern... I know this might be stabbing the heart but Since Bubishi seem very dedicated, I'd throw him some catnip per say (nice pic btw). Nowhere does it say any where on Sun Tzu's text you can't kill your own to gain advantage. One of the immediate and severe example is this Chariot battle. One simple analogy is such as this. Replace their chariot's flag with ours mix with ours, but have those new chariots be filled with their troop as prisoners and run them in front of your troops to create human shield. Inhumain? Unethical? These are the minds of real war, these are just a tip of "viewing not just seeing" that I teach. Then what would result of these bloody presentation to my enemy? what is your will as general? What will you do? The prisoners are sure to die. What will you order your troops to do? Where does it say anywhere on this chapter per instance you can't reduce your numbers strategically in order to gain? Expand your parameter, we are all capable of doing so. As it is a case and point, it seems though only a hand full of sand achieve this knowledge out of all the sand in the world. Only a hand full.... Such is my dim little mind in my so called teaching of this powerful text written in 8,000 some words to prove to the world what our minds are capable of... Looks like another long year after all~ |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
My boss speaks of Luxemburg fitting this space. Look them up.
I see this text as on that accepts the enemy as a friend. We use every resource. All the while, make sure have your flag waving. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Take the enemies expanded body and blend it with yours This requires meticulous screening it can be a Trojan horse you know |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|