BingFa
Guest
|
My thoughts are. . .
And it would seem that because the stakes of warfare are so darn high, that deception is a mandatory element.
And a very critical element as well.
Fortunately, or not, mankind has demonstrated a proclivity and talent to engage in mendacious behaviour at nearly every turn. Thus it is hardly surprising that the sheer lethality and capability of killing fellow human beings has increased over the centuries.
Ahhhh, progress.
When I read The Sun Tzu I have a habit of trying to relate one passage to some other passage and I attempt to see if the interconnectedness of the two passages might hold a more esoteric and deeper meaning.
Hence, the excerpt that "Warfare is the Way of deception," to me points to several other things. First, I think that Sun Tzu was indirectly creating and reemphasizing the important link between being able to win without fighting by managing the perceptions of the opposing General and his Army.
So, paradoxically, whereas most folks would read that excerpt concerning "deception" and construe it to mean one should use deception in order to inflict MORE casualities on an enemy; I hold an opposite point of view and think that this particular excerpt is more accurately interpreted when it is linked to Sun Tzu's admonition that "to win without fighting is the acme of skill."
I am not suggesting that other perspectives are incorrect, but I am saying that my perspective seems to run counter to conventional wisdom.
Stated another way, I believe that Sun Tzu's excerpt concerning "deception" is itself deceptive. Crazy notion, I know. It would take me awhile to explain it, but if you have spent any significant time studying the Art of War, I think you can readily grasp where I am coming from.
I could be imagining things but I really do think that hidden meanings and some not so hidden meanings abound in the Art of War. I mean, simply take the title as an example of my thesis. "Art of War." It sure sounds menancing, doesn't it? To the uninitiated it does. However, one of the more insightful things about the Denma Translation is their interpreattion about "taking whole." They really nailed that one.
Therefore, I have long felt (well, at least since 1989 or 1990) that the Art of War is really a manual on the Art of Peace. And this is one reason why I think The Art of War should be taught in primary schools. I know my idea will not fly in those bastions of liberality that are Cambridge, MA and Berkeley, CA, but one has to still hold on to their dreams.
Peace.
(And I am NOT trying to be deceptive by saying "peace.". . . . . . Okay, I was being deceptive.)
-BingFa
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|