dej2
Full Member
 |
02.004 If troops lay siege to a walled city...
"If you attack cities, their strength will be exhausted"
Sun Tzu of course speaking of the strength of his own troops. Cities in general will have at least a garrison of troops protecting as well as thousands of conscripts if necessary, they will have enough supplies to last months, access to warehouses full of weapons. Cities may have a defensive perimeter armed with spike pits, moats, trenches, fortified walls and towers. The soldiers fighting will have an added incentive to protect their homes, families and loved ones.
What would the purpose be to lay siege to this city? What will this accomplish when it’s over? If the residents of the city are eventually to become subjugated, how productive will they be when you’ve destroyed their homes, killed their friends, family and loved ones. If the purpose is to pillage, how much energy and resources will be wasted while the siege drags on for months, how much will be gained when it’s all over? Total destruction of the city using fire, especially during the hot summer months, would be quicker, but again what would that accomplish, the people left alive would surely hate and despise you, and nothing would be left to plunder.
Remember Sun Tzu lived during the Spring and Autumn Period in China’s History. During this time battles were seen as a duel between gentlemen, just on a bigger scale. Only barbarians laid siege on innocent people. So laying siege on a city would put you in the same class as the Xiong-nu (the Huns).
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|