dej2
Full Member
 |
02.009 Therefore, if one is not fully cognizant of the dangers...
Therefore, if one is not fully cognizant of the dangers inherent in doing battle, one cannot fully know the benefits of doing battle.
Sawyer’s Translation
"Those who do not thoroughly comprehend the dangers inherent in employing the army are incapable of truly knowing the potential advantages of military actions.
Generals that abuse the resources, manpower and finances of the state may cause a whole nation to suffer or even become totally extinct from not realizing the dangers brought forth from warfare. Not to exclude the death and alienation of another people and/or culture, as well as instilling of hatred and mistrust between two or more societies.
For if a general does not recognize the risks taken, how can they recognize the benefits gained by warfare. Outside of insuring the safety and livelihood of it's own people, are wars of conquest really worth the sacrifice in provisions, manpower and life? What is gained, some properties, how productive can a workforce of subjugated people be? What is the possibility of rebellion from these people to gain back what once was lost?
My personal opinion, outside of national defense, is there a real purpose to wage war? In the end much will one nation truly profit by the waging war.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|