Realist
Full Member
|
Hey now. All these people claiming to be ancestors of Zhuge Liang has brought on a little disdain on my part. I have seen ample numbers stating to be the ancestor of Zhuge Liang. To have the uncommon name Zhuge as your family name is certainly an honor, and due to the fame of Zhuge Liang the name has become a symbol of intelligence, wisdom and tactical ability even to this day. But the name is becoming more popular today as more and more people learn of Zhuge Liang's aspirations and attainments. But having his name does not mean you are an ancestor. Take no offense, but the syntax of many of those claiming to be ancestors of the former Prime Minister, is conspiciously abyssmal. Most of them have none or a vague concept of strategy, debating, and little density in their apprehension of literature. Condescending as I might sound, but the theory of natural selection states that the descendant of another will be superior to their predecessors. None of those stating to be ancestors of Kongming seem of no comparison to the Prime Minister - in my own humble opinion. Despite my commonplaced abilities, I have walked in the shadow of the Prime Minister, I have studied his achievements, and his strong apprehension of warfare. Kongming is truly the only soul I have not been able to refute as of yet. Not one error in his strategies, or his ethics - and I can refute anyone that says otherwise. Not because I am superior in any way, but because despite my commonplaced abilities I see the exigencies of our time. Only due to the teachings of Zhuge Liang. The reason I am set against people claiming to be his ancestor is because they have provided prejudice information and have contributed no proof to their claims.
Sharing the same family name is very frail evidence for your claims. Might I be so brusque as to inquire if you have a good reason for your claims? One claims he has looked through the family tree, but has not shown the tree nor has he stated why it conveys what it does. I can solemnly say that I do not see truth in your claims - provide us all with strong evidence, and I shall analyze it ostensibly.
If one person quotes the same again and does not provide hard evidence, it shan't do anything to convert my beliefs.
"I've heard about the "24 Volumes of Military Strategy" and I think it was somewhere in the novel. It was said to have been passed down to his successor, Jiang Wei before he passed away. But then something happened to it I think. Still I'm not sure about that part."
The 24 Volumes of Military Strategy were mentioned in the Three Kingdoms novels. They were said to be passed unto his successor, Jiang Wei. But it has as of yet not had reliable evidence to contribute to this, and it is unknown what happened to the residue or location of the 24 Volumes.
"As we should also know, 70-80% of Romance is historical, but the great achievements of Zhuge Kongming as a military stragiest, political statesman were non-fiction. It was proven in the Sanguo Zhi, there are few exception such as the summoning of the wind in Chibi."
Not necessarily. Some of those achievements were questionable. Such as the debating scene in Volume 2. The incantations prior to the Battle of Chi Bi that conjured the wind are said to be true - though we can never know if any of these histories are true without being present, I believe the histories are true and thus, the history of Zhuge Liang ordering a temple built and his promise to Zhou Yu was witnessed and passed on in memorial. Most evidence would point to the fact that he was the cause of the wind that day. Also, take in mind he didn't actually 'summon' the wind that day, he performed a ritual to convey it in another direction.
"Q1. In your opinion, what do you think Kongming's definiton of strategy was?"
None should take offence. But I shall be so crude as to say that not one here or even alive today has the merit or the versatility to answer that. I could never surmise Kongming's definition of strategy. Only Kongming has the grandeur to answer such a question.
"Q2. What is your definition of strategy?"
Strategy is an ample sized, long-term plan which is often mistaken with tactics. Strategy is a concotion of tactics and in a much larger scale. Strategy is applied in all situations no matter what the circumstance, so in one light, life revolves around strategy. A wise strategist once said: "Those who fail to see the exigencies of our time will fall."
Lo! It was the ancient Sun Tzu and Zhuge Liang! Both deserve mention for taking this immensely to heart.
Henceforth, looking at it from one light, strategy is life; life is strategy. Not one situation does not require strategy as a fundamental.
Q3. How do you apply strategy in your life? I.e family, friends, work , sport...
I apply strategy in all circumstances. Life revolves around strategy, or at least part of it. Everything requires methods and tactics, which are all part of a larger scale - being strategy. Zhuge Liang once said to his elder brother, Zhuge Jin: "... you speak of the realm of sentiment. Whereas I follow the realm of honour." Ethics should always come before sentiment, no matter what the circumstances.
Moral law, as stated by Sun Tzu, comes before the Heavens itself. No matter what the movies convey, not even love should come before Moral law. I believe their is a difference betweeen current legislation and moral law. Moral law is moral, and done by your own morals. Thus not even today's modern law should outweigh your own morals. However, if you condone these laws in order to play out your own morals for a time, this would be acceptable. As Sun Tzu once said: "All war is based on deception.". That is how I apply strategy to my life. Thank you sonshi for creating this forum. So many people could learn, and come to understand and see the exigencies of our time. You have warranted them to do so. You only need those who have a the ability to learn them.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|